As Democrats point fingers to the Republicans and Republicans point fingers at the Democrats, the one thing not happening in Congress is the stoppage of sequester. As it stands, the impact of the changes will begin as early as midnight on Thursday.
But how will this change impact those in Montgomery County? Another hard-hit department may be that of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Joel Johnson, executive director of the Montgomery County Housing Authority knows this fact all too well. Funded through the U.S. Department HUD, his department’s funding is in jeopardy with the fiscal year only half over.
“We receive four monies from four pots,” said Johnson. “Depending on Congressional allocation, the amounts vary.”
Two types of funding, Johnson said, fall under the voucher program.
To read part one of the series on the impact of county offices, click here.
To read part two on the impact to county seniors, click here.
“That is federal rent subsidization, utilized by households in the private marketplace,” said Johnson. In other words, privately-owned and –operated landlords can receive the rent.
“One big line item is for rent money, on behalf of program participants,” said Johnson. “A second line item is administration fees, paid for to staff and administer the programs.”
The other two “pots” of money support rental units owned and operated by the housing authority.
Of top concern with sequestration, Johnson said, would be cuts to the voucher program.
“It seems sequestration could have an impact of perhaps around 35 percent on the administration fee side that could be cut out of the budget,” he said. “On the rent-to-owner side, we could be impacted by probably 8 percent.”
Johnson is worried about the impact on his staff.
“On the administration side, we are carefully looking at our operation, we always have been very careful to function efficiently,” he said. “We’ll just have to be more careful moving forward.”
He hopes to prevent layoffs.
“We are hoping with some reserve funding, we are able to avoid short-term impacts on our staff,” said Johnson.
The Montgomery County residents that rely on the program, however, may not be as lucky.
“Under the voucher program, 2,600 participate in the county, all over the county,” said Johnson. “We are present in 90 percent of the 62 municipalities with our voucher program.”
He said 57 municipalities have 2,600 active leases, serving that many households with support.
“These are families with children, elderly, disabled,” said Johnson.
While the department has not yet gotten word on actual cuts, Johnson said he has been following trade organizations’ takes on the change.
“The impact could be up to a 25 percent reduction on the public housing operating fund,” he said. “Money comes from Congress to operate HUD.”
The county’s housing authority operates seven locations in the county, with 615 total public housing units.
Until Congress breaks down the reductions, the department will remain unsure of its future, but will try to create the smallest impact on its residents as possible.
“A cut would be on the operating subsidy, the money we get to operate the building,” said Johnson. “We have no plans on closing any [of the housing locations], we’d scale back some services.”
To read part one of the series on the impact of county services, visit this link.
To read part two of the series on the impact to area seniors, visit this link.
1. Sequestration was the brain-child of the Obama White House. Created by Jack Lew (Chief-of-Staff then, current Treasury Secretary nominee) and Rob Nabor (White House Congressional Laison); approved by President Obama for proposal to Congress; and accepted as a potential solution to the debt ceiling negotiations in 2011. 2. We're here because The President reneged on a promise to consider significant cuts to spending, when he won tax increases on those earning $450K, as part of the fiscal cliff negotiations in Dec-Jan.
The thing that froths me the most is...how the Dictator makes himself out to be the victim here in all of this. My question is...is anybody really listening to this a$$clown anymore?
2. He has considered cuts to spending. He has proposed several (though admittedly not enough). He just can't enact them. Things must be passed by Congress, then you can complain about the President if he doesn't sign them.
That's two strikes right there. Now we have The President trying to convince The People that sequestration was all the Republicans idea! (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/341553/obama-caught-lying-about-sequester-deroy-murdock) Strike three! (Can you tell I'm ready for baseball season?)
That was from the debates in which all sides shamelessly lied (not saying it's right, but hey, it's how it worked). In either case, it was supported by key Congressional Republicans who have not done their job (along with Congressional Democrats who didn't do their job) to compromise to reduce the deficit. Also, yes baseball!
We Have Jack Lew’s College Thesis You mean this Jack Lew ???? Sequestration was the brain-child of the Obama White House. Created by Jack Lew Yes this Jack Lew :-( http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/27/want-to-know-what-treasury-nominee-jack-lew-wrote-in-his-college-thesis-about-social-security-being-a-right-we-have-a-copy/
Continuing on with dire warnings about sequesterageddon, Obama warns that the across-the-board budget cuts will hurt education and could result in teacher lay-offs. Obama’s own Secretary of Education announced on Sunday: “There are literally teachers now who are getting pink slips, who are getting notices that they can’t come back this fall.” Oh noes! The claim is actually a lie, or — as the Washington Post explains it — “not backed by evidence.” The descriptions of the post-sequester landscape that have been coming out of the Obama Administration have been alarming, specific–and, in at least some cases, hyped. … When he was pressed in a White House briefing Wednesday to come up with an example, Duncan named a single county in West Virginia and acknowledged, “whether it’s all sequester-related, I don’t know.” con't
Officials in Kanawha County, West Virginia say that the “transfer notices” sent to at least 104 educators had more to do with a separate matter that involves a change in the way West Virginia allocates federal dollars designated for poor children. The transfer notices are required by state law and give teachers a warning that they may be moved to a different position next school year. They don’t necessarily mean a teacher has been laid off, said Pam Padon, director of federal programs and Title 1 for the Kanawha County public schools. “It’s not like we’re cutting people’s jobs at this point.” I’m sure Duncan simply misspoke. Or maybe he was just commenting on the information available to him at the time, or something. http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2013/02/27/obama-administration-caught-in-a-lie-heres-how-the-media-report-it/