patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Why Didn't Tom Corbett Stop Jerry Sandusky?

Will Gov. Tom Corbett's role in the Sandusky investigation continue to haunt him when he seeks re-election?

 

Columnist and investigative reporter Chris Freind, a longtime supporter of Gov. Tom Corbett, has penned an open letter to the state leader asking tough questions about the Jerry Sandusky child rape scandal.

Freind says Corbett refuses to answer disturbing questions about his role as attorney general in investigating Sandusky.

Freind contends that Corbett could have stopped Sandusky, but didn't.

Will Corbett's role in the Sandusky saga affect his re-election campaign? Vote in our poll and add your comments below.

Pennsylvania has re-elected every governor for a second term since 1971.

 

  • How much will the Jerry Sandusky scandal affect Tom Corbett's re-election bid?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Not much, it will be old news by then
        6 (9%)
    • It could be a big issue if Corbett doesn't answer the tough questions
        51 (83%)
    • Too soon to tell
        4 (6%)
    Total votes: 61
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Jerry Sandusky, Penn State, Penn State Sex Scandal, and gov. tom corbett

Bob Guzzardi

6:12 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

The Attorney General is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in Pennsylvania and failed to act. The Freeh Report did not discuss the failures of law enforcement. As this matter unravels and the shock begins to wear off, I think there will be increasing focus on Tom Corbett.

Pennsylvanians will be voting an Attorney General on November 6. Tom Corbett's Man, Dave Freed, is tainted by his intertwined association with Tom Corbett and by his relationship with his own father in law (the grandfather of this children) who is under active investigation for financial improprieties at Hershey Trust. Many voters may not want to vote for man that is, more likely than not, to cover up a cover up.

The Democrat, Kathleen Kane, is a "prosecutor, not a politician" who does not seem to have ambition for any higher office.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Liberty 1

7:06 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

"The Democrat, Kathleen Kane, is a "prosecutor, not a politician" who does not seem to have ambition for any higher office." Yea, and are you interested in a bridge in NY that I am selling cheap? Pleeeeease stop. She should be running as an independent if she does not have any political aspirations.

Dana Grubb

6:36 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

I've said from the start that in addition to failures by administrators at Penn State in the Jerry Sandusky child abuse case, then PA Attorney General and now Governor Corbett dropped the ball on this as the chief law enforcement official of the state. What makes Corbett look worse is that he jumped into the fray as a member of the PSU trustees hurling stones at Joe Paterno and others, never once admitting that he could have done more. It is time that he be held accountable and this charade be stopped. He was as much at blame on the law enforcement side of things as otheres were on the PSU administrative side.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jenn F

4:39 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Same thoughts here--why wasn't more done earlier?! And, how can Corbett stand aside now and throw rocks at anyone when he had a much clearer picture of what Sandusky was accused of than anyone else??

Comment_arrow

Pat Musselman

1:57 pm on Thursday, July 19, 2012

I agree. It is the job of an Attorney General to uphold the laws of the Commonwealth. Corbett failed his job!

Liberty 1

7:13 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

I do not believe that the whole story is known yet. But that matters not to the political hounds who are so quick to point blame to those they don't like when all that does is muck up the waters. Corbett should answer ALL the questions of his involvment but before long I think his political opponents will have him soaping up in the shower with Sandusky.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teresa Flint-Barber

2:21 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I agree, the whole story is not yet known. Sandusky is the tip of the ice burg here. Yes, he was the one who could take the fall, even in his "mighty position". Sandusky is the lowest man on this totem pole. I believe that we have not heard the end of Pennsylvania's children being victims of pedophilia within institutions while perpetrators are protected by systems and people in positions of power. Human trafficking comes to mind.

WILFREDO G. SALCEDO, Sr.

7:56 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Since Corbett's name came up on this scandal, we might as well go all the way to the top, read: Ed Rendell!

Reply

John Fox

11:12 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

People have too short of an attention span for this to be an issue when he is up for re-election. Kony 2012 right?

Reply

Just Sick and Tired

4:31 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

in PA laws are for the unconnected. People that are connected to government don't pay attention to laws, they expect and get special treatment. That goes for everything from obtaining variances from the township to raping and pillaging on a grand scale state wide level. The whole state is a corrupt cesspool when it comes to government

Reply

Lisa Riu Cressman

5:06 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

i believe corbett knew all along what sandusky was doing. he's as guilty as everyone else who was involved. and i do agree with heather. impeach him now!

Reply

Vicki Youngelman

5:16 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

The question in politics is always "why." Why would Governor Corbett sacrifice his entire political career on this very serious issue? What would his reward be to cover up? Governor Corbett is an extremely intelligent man and knows how to say no. Let's hope the facts show he was not involved in any cover up. I hope so for his sake and far more for the State of Pennsylvania. We can not condemn until we know the truth. The truth somtimes get distorted but you can not fool a well informed voter in the end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sugaree

11:23 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

"but you can not fool a well informed voter in the end."
Herein lies the problem; people have short attention spans, and will forget all about this by the time he is up for reelection.
Nobody pays any attention to state politics, which is a darn shame, b/c the characters in Harrisburg make the Washington DC crowd look honest by comparision.
Corbett will get a second term, because as someone else said, PA has a long history of two terms for Governors, despite all the things he has done which hasn't exactly made him popular. People seem to develop amnesia come voting day and just vote for whichever party they like more. Sad isn't it?

Pat Shane

10:14 am on Thursday, July 19, 2012

As Attorney General, Tom Corbett received over $647,000 in campaign contributions from members of the Second Mile Foundation, while only assigning one investigator to the case.

Meanwhile, at the same time, he assigned 14 investigators to Bill Deweese, who spent more than 5 years trying to get him.

It is difficult to believe these campaign contributions did not improperly influence his decision to not file charges against Jerry Sandusky.

The state police trooper who initially handled the Clinton County case against Jerry Sandusky believed there was enough evidence from a teenage boy -- now known as Victim One-- to charge Sandusky with indecent assault.

See video below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji7UQhr3z3M

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott Alderfer

5:15 pm on Monday, July 23, 2012

Further proof of Corbett's culpability is that he allowed Sandusky's arrest to be delayed until Paterno had passed Eddie Robinson in all-time wins. I'm sure that there was enough evidence to arrest Sandusky before the 2011 football season started. But Corbett, the former Attorney General who had intimate knowledge of the investigation for several years AND who, as governor, is a member of the PSU Board of Trustees, waited until Paterno had his record-breaking win to have Sandusky arrested and taken off the streets.

Bob Guzzardi

10:37 am on Thursday, July 19, 2012

Thanks Pat Shane Good information for those who want to put their heads in the sand. Outside SE Pennsylvania, there is a lot more attention to State politics. Democrat Kathleen Kane is a viable challenger and will, more likely than not, investigate the investigation.

Reply

SMYRNA-X

3:48 pm on Thursday, July 19, 2012

If corbett were a dem we would not be having this conversation. With a scandle like this he could be nominated and elected by any dem constituency anywhere.

Reply
Comment_arrow

optimist

6:23 pm on Thursday, July 19, 2012

Was wondering when you teabaggers were going to defend your boy. Took you a little longer than usual.

Comment_arrow

Pat Musselman

8:14 pm on Thursday, July 19, 2012

Guess you really don't know any Democrats!

Comment_arrow

Scott Alderfer

5:23 pm on Monday, July 23, 2012

No, Smyrna-X (by the way, did your mother actually name you that?). If Corbett was a Democrat, the GOP-controlled PA Senate and General Assembly would have already started impeachment proceedings. Corbett is going to continue looking out for his cronies until voters from both parties vote him out when he runs for re-election. And don't think that Corbett's involvement will get fully investigated by the next Attorney General if Corbett's boy Freed is elected.

Comment_arrow

Bob Guzzardi

5:59 pm on Monday, July 23, 2012

If Tom Corbett's hand picked candidate, Dave Freed, is elected the next AG, we will never find out what happened. There are a lot of unanswered questions.

John Q. Public

8:07 pm on Thursday, July 19, 2012

There's an active investigation on this very issue going on right now. Perhaps SmyrnaX wants to wait for the results before passing judgement. Reports today are Penn State ignored the state investigator's multiple subpoenas, and did not turn over the emails when requested, and even denied their very existence. If the DA's office failed, or were lied to by Penn State, we will know soon enough. Put the agendas away for a few days, and comment when the facts are known.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Liberty 1

8:43 pm on Thursday, July 19, 2012

John Q - Are you lonely out there? A reasoned voice crying in the wilderness!There is hope.

Bugs Bunny

8:54 pm on Thursday, July 19, 2012

Pat Musselman, your as silly as my friends Daffy and Tweety.

Reply

Mike Hunt

2:53 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

So who do you think had the Centre Co. DA killed! Yes he is missing and nobody thinks there's a problem? Let's see who stands to be damaged the most here from the DAs information?? Who has the resources to do this? I'll bet our gov knows... He was on bed with Jerry! Let's not forget that Jerry was doing fundraisers for Uncle Tom. If you think that is going to produce a fair investigation your in a fantasy world or republican. Also who received 900,000 from the shale oil industry? Yep Uncle Tom. Who rushed to state college when this broke to direct the liars club? OPen your eyes and stop playing party politics. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck .... Must be a duck.

Reply

careless fills

4:38 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

Corbett got the case right. If he pressed the case too soon with only one victim, it would have failed given Sandusky's stature in the community. Corbett's office methodically developed other leads that the county prosecutor didn't find. See : http://articles.philly.com/2012-07-19/news/32731243_1_jerry-sandusky-case-ben-andreozzi-serial-child-predator

Reply

Pat Shane

6:31 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

so they couldn't restrict his access on campus, or access to children? They had to allow him to continue to molest young boys to 'methodically develop' other leads??

Sorry, but I think the Second Mile contributions had a little more to do with this rather than a strategic method.

Reply
Comment_arrow

careless fills

9:28 pm on Friday, July 20, 2012

PSU could have easily restricted Sandusky from the locker room and other campus facilities after he left their employ. Those who say that he was entitled to access as a contractual matter are dead wrong. If PSU banned Sandusky, his only recourse would be to go to court, and he wouldn't have, knowing the risks to himself.

No one knows what Gricar's reasoning was in not prosecuting Sandusky in 1998. Perhaps that will come out in the future investigations. At that point it was a local county matter, and the state Attorney General, whoever it was at the time would not have been involved. Corbett office picked up the ball after the case entered the state child abuse system when a mother reported a case in 2009 nad proceded witht he grand jury and other investigations which were methodically in effective completed.

The fault for any delays starts with PSU in 1998 and 1999 with the original county level case, and with PSU in the 2000 case with the janitor witness and the 2002 with the Mc Queary observations, and one could only expect that some PSU had suspicions before 1998.

Bobby King

11:47 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

I have to give Corbett a pass on this one. As the AG he definitely knew of the investigation. Being privy to an investigation, one has to keep it in secret. If he would have taken action before the grand jury was completed, he would have jeopardized the entire case. Imagine if this would have occurred with the result of Sandusky walking free. He was in a tight spot considering his position.

Reply

Bob Guzzardi

11:58 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012

State Police investigators. As soon as he knew about McQueary, he had to know and what wonders if he thought this was a problem to be handled or whether he was disgusted and infuriated enough to give this a priority. http://casablancapa.blogspot.com/2012/06/we-had-shortage-of-investigators.html

Reply

louis kootsares

8:32 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012

being a republican i still have my own opinion of our governor... he sucks 1 term if he does not get thrown out of office

Reply

careless fills

5:47 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

Corbett did stop Sandusky. His method was a thorough and complete investigation, which led to Sandusky's conviction.

On the other hand, the way that the Bernie FIne case was handled was an abomination, since he was tried and convicted in the press before the real investigations started and he was cleared by several different entities. His stellar reputation is forever ruined by this improper rush to judgement. See: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaab--bernie-fine-s-day-of-vindication-should-serve-as-lesson-in-caution-for-public--media-09021709.html

The state AG's office was stellar in its performance, both with Corbett at its helm and later with Corbett more or less out of the picture as governor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Walter

10:41 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

He stopped it, but how many years later after the fact? If he knew about it when the actions were taking place, how come it took this many years to get Sandusky thrown in jail?

Comment_arrow

Patrick Shane

8:28 am on Monday, November 12, 2012

You're just plain wrong. Thorough and complete investigation? Corbett received over $647,000 in campaign contributions from members of the Second Mile Foundation, while only assigning one investigator to the case.

How is that thorough and complete? It's not even ethical!

Jay Bell

9:52 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

Corbett is too busy worrying about corporate money, rather than the welfare of people; for example, he thinks "fracking" on college campuses is okay which shows he has no regard for public education or the sanctity of education for all. www.firebrandcentral.com

Reply

James Walter

10:39 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

Here's one that Corbett tried to pull.... Not saying the district, but after budget was all said and done just not singed yet, he waited till all the union big wigs left town to go to a convention of sorts and decided at the last minute to write in a new law that with a 5-4 vote from the school board, any school within the district could be turned into a charter school. Effectively making all teacher contracts null and void. Luckily one union head stayed back just to make sure everything would get signed and caught this. Not even the higher ups knew he was doing this. He is a very sneaky man and should be immediately removed if this is how he conducts business. He has millions tucked away for a rainy day fund, but do any of us know how he's using it?

Reply

Leave a comment